Signal founder reveals Telegram’s failure as an encrypted messenger


The wars of the Encrypted Messengers are escalating. In a revealer Twitter feed Posted last week, Moxie Marlinspike, the founder of the Signal messaging app, launched a tirade that essentially calls Telegram the worst choice when it comes to encrypted messengers.

It’s a bold enough statement to call a competitor like that publicly. What does he know that we don’t know? Well, a lot. Fortunately, he breaks it down below.

The gist of the Twitter feed comes down to this. Marlinspike doesn’t like the media lumping Signal together in the same conversation as Telegram and claiming the app is not really encrypted, as the app leads us to believe.

Marlinspike explains it better than I ever could, so let’s take a look at the thread and see what he has to say about it all:

Marlinspike’s beef with Telegram is mostly how the media covers them. The company markets its app like any other app to register new users. But are Marlinspike’s claims about Telegram’s encryption valid?

As a Twitter user note in response To Marlinspike, “Before you take out the competition instead of actually improving your stagnant product, you should probably give the whole story,” Twitter user @ AllStars101X wrote in a tweet. “Although the telegram does not have a full e2e, it does have some level of client-server encryption (enough to prevent major data mining).”

Marlinspike’s Twitter thread certainly ruffled a few feathers. A Twitter user replied to Marlinspike, “Improve Signal instead of attacking competitors. Lame. ”Others shared the same sentiment in the list of responses to the Twitter feed.

The thread goes on forever, as do the responses to the original thread. Finally, in response to a response on how Signal could improve its app over bashing its competitors, in conclusion, Marlinespike proposed this answer:

“A lot of people use and love Signal, and there is a great team working hard every day to make it better. This thread is not about Signal or what people “should” value or use. This is to call something that does not provide encrypted communication an “encrypted messenger“.

Do you have any thoughts on this? Let us know below in the comments or refer the discussion to our Twitter Where Facebook.

Editor’s recommendations:

Source link


Comments are closed.